When plunder becomes a way of life

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it."….. FREDERIC BASTIAT

OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE BEING STRIPPED AWAY FROM US BY CORRUPT JUDGE'S

Group gathers to urge freedom for taxpayer advocate Richard Fine
By Troy Anderson, Staff Writer
Updated: 04/20/2010 06:00:44 PM PDT


Chanting "This is America, not Russia," about 75 people gathered Tuesday morning outside the downtown Stanley Mosk Courthouse to urge the U.S. Supreme Court to free former taxpayer advocate attorney Richard I. Fine from jail.

In Washington, D.C., about 50 people staged a similar protest on the steps of the high court, which is scheduled to meet Friday to decide whether Fine should be released.

Fine, a 70-year-old Tarzana resident and former U.S. Department of Justice attorney, has spent more than a year in Men's Central Jail for contempt after refusing to divulge financial information. Fine was placed under "coercive confinement" following a series of cases in which he alleged judges received an extra $57,000 in pay from the county on top of their $179,000 annual state salaries. Fine alleged that these "undeclared bonuses" render judges biased in cases where the county is a defendant.

"Richard Fine has been cruelly, unjustly punished for bringing to light a judicial issue that affects each of us as Los Angeles residents and U.S. citizens," said Chatsworth resident Janette Isaacs, co-organized of "Free Richard Fine," a grassroots, community organization committed to ending judicial corruption in California.

"This could happen to anyone."

Retired Sheriff's Department Sgt. Richard Valdemar, who served as the "jailer" in the case of Los Angeles Herald-Examiner reporter William Farr who was held in jail in 1972 for contempt for


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Advertisement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
refusing to divulge sources relating to the Charles Manson case, said a person has a right to actually be charged with a crime if they are held in jail for more than a year.
"We don't even house our misdemeanor people in jail for more than a year," Valdemar said. "Yet Mr. Fine is being held longer and it's not like Mr. Fine is a kook or something. This is a man who is an expert on the law and is trying to do the right thing. He's basically a whistleblower and he's being punished for that."

In a letter to the Supreme Court, Fine's daughter, Victoria Fine, an editor with The Huffington Post, asked the justices to release her father "from the horror he and my family have endured during the last 13 months of our lives."

"He has raised me to trust in our country's justice system to uphold freedom, democracy and moral right," she wrote. "I admit that as today, as my father sits in solitary confinement, I have very little faith left in our American system. But now, as I write to you, I place that faith in your hands to make the decision that will free my father and send him home to my mother and me."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AS ABOVE WE SEE HOW JUDGE'S ABUSE THEIR POWER, SEE BELOW HOW THE ELDERLY AND THEIR FAMILIES ARE BEING ABUSED AS WELL!!!

We request that the President Obama to stop this corruption and violation of our Constitutional Rights and hold these Judge's, Attorney's and Guardian's responsible for their crimes against the elderly and their family's.

Like many of us in Guardianship cases fight for the right to care for our parents, the more we fight, the more these Judge's abuse and violate the laws. Who's watching these corrupt Judge's, who gave them all this power, I think its time that this power should be taken away from them.

My mother Yvonne Sarhan was murdered by Judge Celeste Muir on February 2, 2010 she allowed the Guardian Vicki Brail and Dr Steven Leslie Kaplan to poison my mother with 400 mg of Seroquel a day until she was dead, why because the guardian and attorney's already took all the money from our family.

We believe since our since our Governor Charlie Christ has allowed this to happen in our State, our Congressmen the Balart brothers have allowed this to continue for years, we believe the President of the United States through the chain of command must stop these Human Rights and Constitutional Rights Violations against our American Citizens young and old.

This is a request to meet President Obama as soon as possible to stop the abuse and exploitation of the elderly and their family's......Robert Sarhan, MD

Elder Law

Elderly Millionaire Is Destitute After Payment of Fees for Lawyers and Care

Posted Apr 13, 2010 5:59 AM CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss

• Email
• Print
• Reprints
• 

Marie Long was worth $1.3 million when she suffered a stroke and came under protection of a Maricopa County, Ariz., probate court in 2005.

Today the 88-year-old woman, Marie Long, is destitute after a judge approved $786,000 in attorney, guardianship and companion-care fees for the woman, columnist Laurie Roberts writes in the Arizona Republic. The woman’s onetime guardian, the Sun Valley Group, had assigned itself as Long’s caregiver, charging $235,000 for companion care and $182,000 for guardianship duties, Roberts wrote in a separate column last month.

Itemized charges included $32.50 to go to the bank for Long, $106 to pick up hearing aid batteries, and $62 to discuss a kitchen grease fire caused by a Sun Valley employee, Roberts says.

Judge Lindsay Ellis blamed Long’s court-appointed lawyer, as well as two lawyers for Long’s sisters, for driving up costs, Roberts says. The judge said the lawyers’ "venomous" and "hateful" attacks on the trustee, the guardian and their attorneys resulted in costly litigation.

But Roberts says it’s wrong to blame the three lawyers challenging the fees and instead points the finger at Ellis.

“The court that is supposed to be protecting people like Marie Long is doing no such thing,” Roberts writes. “Instead, the court is allowing a cozy group of lawyers and fiduciaries who are appointed to help vulnerable people help themselves to a nice pile of cash—until the money is gone, at which time the ‘ward’ is dumped onto the taxpayers.”

Now the Sun Valley Group is seeking sanctions against the two lawyers who represented the sisters, alleging they had no standing to sue for breach of fiduciary duty. The lawyers' suit had contended Sun Valley had a duty to investigate whether the Arizona Department of Veterans Services could have served as Marie's guardian, at a cost of only $75 a month.

Roberts decries the turn of events, especially since the lawyers worked for free. “This, apparently, is what you get in probate for trying to advocate for a defenseless widow,” she writes.

A Silent Crisis: Elder Abuse and Justice in America

My grandmother’s life intersected squarely with the unprecedented rise in life expectancy for all elders. This rise has also led to one of our greatest silent crises: elder abuse.

About same time Alzheimer’s began to cloud my grandmother's once sharp mind, she heard a knock on the door of her 3rd floor apartment in Des Moines, Iowa. She opened it to find a friendly salesman selling John F. Kennedy half-dollars made out of pure gold in a frame with a blue velvet backing. They made an exchange --she handed him a check for $900 and the swindler gave her one dollar in coins.

ELDER ABUSE IN THE UNITED STATES
For millions of elderly people in the United States just like my grandmother, living longer has also meant living in silent fear, battered and beaten, preyed upon, often quieted by shame. Elder abuse is a prolific problem that comes in many forms – physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect and financial exploitation, with many elders suffering more than just one type of abuse. Of the five million elders estimated to suffer abuse in the U.S. alone each year, the vast majority are subject to multiple forms of mistreatment. They are also three times more likely to die prematurely than those who are not victimized.

Yet, elder abuse is not perceived as a national tragedy. No one talks about it. Silence remains, in part, because many of our elders are isolated by and dependent on those who hurt them, and the perceived shame and stigma of disclosing that they are suffering at the hands of their own caregiver can act as a powerful silencer. But abuse also stays hidden because many older Americans don’t have the means or the capacity to report it.

At the rare times when elder abuse is publicly discussed, the conversations usually feature the voices Elder Justice advocates, social workers or journalists. A typical example is this CBS News report from 2006. Only occasionally do we get a glimpse into the elders' views which can be seen in this video taken at an elder justice rally.

Insights from these experts are critical in the fight to secure justice for older Americans but so is the wisdom from these elders themselves, and to date their voices have been absent from the debate that affects them most directly.

I was surprised to learn how deeply buried this issue is because elder abuse touches us all. It cuts across gender, social, racial, ethnic, economic and geographic lines - yet it’s rarely mentioned in social justice or human rights circles nationally or even internationally. Key UN documents from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to the Millennium Development Goals omit any mention of age. And here at home the U.S Congress has yet to pass comprehensive federal legislation to protect our oldest members of society, placing it 20 years behind advocacy to protect children from abuse and 10 years behind the work to end domestic violence.

THE ELDER JUSTICE COALITION
To address this colossal fissure in our laws, more than 500 members of the Elder Justice Coalition (EJC) have been vigilantly working over the course of the last decade to secure the passage of the Elder Justice Act (EJA) through Congress. Passing this Act will provide us with a foundation from which we can begin to protect our society’s elders because it will provide long-needed support for programs to help us understand how to prevent and detect abuse, intervene where it happens, treat victims with dignity and respect, and fairly prosecute perpetrators.

Yet despite the EJA’s principled objectives and many years of effort, one of the authors of the Act, Marie-Therese Connolly explains, “Comprehensive federal laws to combat child abuse and domestic violence have had an immense impact for decades. By contrast, the relatively uncontroversial Elder Justice Act has languished (in Congress) since 2002.” With the recent changes in Washington, now is the time to pass this act and give America’s elders the security, dignity and equality they deserve.

A NEW WITNESS PARTNERSHIP with the NATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING
So why is this important to WITNESS? We are partnering with the National Council on Aging (NCOA) – which has been working on behalf of disadvantaged and vulnerable Elders for over 60 years - to bring the voices of Older Americans to this debate, heighten the visibility of Elder abuse, and end Congressional complacency. In addition to securing passage of the EJA, WITNESS and NCOA will work with Elder Justice organizations across the country, training activists in strategic video advocacy planning and giving them the skills necessary to collect stories of abuse to bring Elder Justice into the national conversation.

Once footage from across the country has been gathered and edited, we will collaborate to reach key Congressional representatives, the national media and our citizenry with compelling stories which will force us to face our elders, end our collective denial and pass the EJA.

YOU TOO CAN STAND UP FOR OUR ELDERS
WITNESS and NCOA are just beginning work on the planning of this video advocacy campaign. We'd like you to join in as we move forward with this campaign to pass the Elder Justice Act and showcase the voices of older Americans:

• Return to the Hub Blog for updates on the production process in the weeks and months ahead
• Sign up for the Video for Change newsletter for updates on the Elder Justice Campaign
• Read more about the work of the NCOA at http://www.ncoa.org, and
• Visit the site of the Elder Justice Coalition at http://www.elderjusticecoalition.com/

Most of all though, we ask you to listen as we bring the voices of American’s elders to you throughout this campaign. Please hear what they have to say. Respect their voice. Value their wisdom. Add yours.

Source=>>here

President Obama, Please Help Us Stop Elderly Abuse and Exploitation by Our Judge's, Attorney's and Guardian"s

FOR the LOVE of MOTHER
For mothers who experience isolation, mental abuse and liquidation of assets, by children who are Power of Attorney.

This Blog
Linked From Here
The Web
This Blog
Linked From Here
The Web

Sunday, September 20, 2009

365 Days of Isolation - One Year Anniversary of Mother's Isolation
Today, September 20, 2009, is the one year anniversary of the commencement of mother's isolation and control by her POA and other siblings.Yes, that is right, it has been 365 days since my mother has been isolated.We've had to file court papers to put a stop to this abuse.No family nor person should have to endure what some of my siblings have gone through.There is such control and isolation including monitoring of who my mother sees and talks to it is unbelievable. State agencies have not intervened. They do not want to get involved with the politics of such an issue by some who have political connections.The sad part is mother is being told what to say and do. She even has que cards of what to say by certain siblings.Mother's children can not see or talk to her, yet girlfriends and nephews and parents of in-laws can.We can only assume it is FINANCE ABUSE. Evidence has come forth and MORE TO COME, noting substantial withdraw of financial accounts (even before they have matured).In the mean time, MOTHER is still being isolated. NOW 365 days!We love our mother and FOR the LOVE of MOTHER we are fighting for her every day!We love you mom!!!
Posted by FOR the LOVE of MOTHER at 6:29 PM 0 comments
Thursday, September 3, 2009

Day 349 of Mother's Isolation
It is now day 349 of Mother's isolation from her closest and dearest children. Mother has been isolated, coerced by siblings, coached and guarded 24/7.Liquidation of Mother's finances has occurred too. Yet, NOTHING has been done by the state. NOTHING. Our system of government has seriously broken down to even include the most vulnerable -- an elderly woman with dementia.Again, day 349 of mother being isolated and abused from her closest and dearest children.
Posted by FOR the LOVE of MOTHER at 6:24 PM 0 comments
Saturday, August 29, 2009

344 days of isolation and mental abuse of MOTHER
I am starting this blog today to see how many other families are witnessing and suffering from siblings as Power of Attorney (POA) and others, from isolating their mother from their closest and favorite siblings.So far for our family it has been 344 days, 11months & 10 days, 29,721,600 second, 495,360 minutes, 8256 hours or 49 weeks (rounded down) since mother got ill and when the POA and siblings started isolating mother from 7 of mother's children.FOR the LOVE of MOTHER we are working hard to defeat the system of government that does little to intervene and protect an elderly woman even after countless complaints have been filed by family members.We are praying daily for someone to help us see our mother. Siblings have been kicked out, been prevented from seeing mother, phone calls going unanswered while being monitored by other siblings (isolating mother from us) and so on.I seek others who have had NO or LITTLE help from state agencies. We have had very little help at all and our case has been closed noting "confidential."FOR THE LOVE OF MOTHER (we pray for help)!
Posted by FOR the LOVE of MOTHER at 2:38 PM 3 comments
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
FOR the LOVE of MOTHER
Daughters united to save mother from isolationView my complete profile

Memories of Happiness


Shoreline couple headed to prison for ripping off elderly woman
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/theblotter/2009758221_a_shoreline_couple_accused_of.html

Dying woman recovers, says relatives "robbed me blind"
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/08/elderly_woman_says_her_relativ.html



Blog Archive
▼ 2009 (3)
▼ September (2)
365 Days of Isolation - One Year Anniversary of Mo...
Day 349 of Mother's Isolation
► August (1)
344 days of isolation and mental abuse of MOTHER


Elder Abuse
Elder Abuse News
Market Wire (press release) - Minister of State (Seniors) Speaks With Oshawa Seniors at Town ...
powered by

President Barack Obama, Please, We Need To Meet With You A.S.A.P.

THE NATIONAL ELDER ABUSE AND GUARDIANSHIP
VICTIMS TASKFORCE FOR CHANGE

Robert Sarhan, MD
22795 S.W. 212 Ave
Miami, Fl 33170
DrRob2007@yahoo.co
Tel.No. 305-338-6160

Bonnie Reiter
809 Par Circle
DelrayBeach,Fl 33445
bonnie.reiter@yahoo.com
Tel.No 561-502-4700
Dear ACLU,
We believe that the State of Florida is a government body which is illegally stripping the civil rights of a specific group of people, mainly the elderly, who may also have some physical disabilities. This should fall under The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The courts are forcing the elderly into an Emergency Temporary Guardianship (ETG), labeling these persons Alleged Incapacitated Person (AIP) under the guise of providing ‘assistance.’ These same courts never verify the allegations of imminent danger, who made the allegations, and why the allegations were made to the courts. Instead, the courts routinely strip the civil rights away from elders who have property, assets and income, and remand the same elders into a forced guardianship against their will. Subsequently “professional guardians” are in a position to steal assets under the guise of professional guardianship fees, with no monitoring or oversight, and are forcing these same elderly people to pay for the legal fees generated by the guardians to pay the lawyers who represent these guardians. This outrageous guardianship scheme is out of control. It is kidnapping and the carnage is not just financial: it is emotional abuse and at times results in wrongful or premature death.
It is those elders who have assets who are being denied their civil rights at the hands of a three-person panel, appointed by the courts. This panel consists of a psychiatrist, psychologist, and a lay person. These people are from a small pool, at the discretion of Judges, with no monitoring or oversight. Normal procedures which strip a person of his/her civil rights would require a court to involve a jury of people that are unbiased. The courts are therefore violating the elder’s 7th Amendment right to a trial by jury. The probate courts have substituted this constitutional right and have replaced it with a pool of people who are chosen by a judge. These judges then routinely use the same people over and over again. The fees generated by the court-appointed guardians and their attorneys are paid out of the ward’s assets, another violation of a civil right. The loss of the right to control your assets is the first major civil right that is violated by the court.
In Palm Beach County, a court-ordered psychiatrist and a psychologist are paid 300 dollars to visit an elder person for 15 minutes. No witnesses are allowed at this interview. The lay person is paid 75 dollars for their 15 minute interview. All fees are paid by the AIP. No notes, no recording, no stenographer are required to substantiate their findings. This is a clear violation of our 14th Amendment which is the Constitutional Rights of Due Process.
Their right to counsel is severed in the ETG stage, denying their right to private counsel and funds for such counsel to protect their own rights. On the simple report made by each of these three people, the elderly are routinely forced into guardianship, which strips them of all their civil rights. They are no longer allowed to make decisions concerning their own medical, housing, family, social, financial, and legal wishes. When family or friends of the adjudicated incapacitated person (AIP) attempt to stop this illegal act, they are shut down and shut out of the legal process, often being told they have no legal standing. Now even family and friends lose their civil rights to address the court. The AIP is told they cannot have their own counsel, but is forced to use the court’s counsel.
Court-appointed lawyers are often picked by their favorite judges to take cases, while at the same time having relationships which are adverse in nature to the wards. For example, a lawyer can be appointed to represent a ward they do not know, while at the same time representing the guardian in other cases, who are adverse to the AIP, which are a conflict of interest and a violation of due process. This conflict of interest is rampant in guardianship cases. Lawyers who deal with guardianship issues have dealings with various professional associations. This incestuous behavior is being encouraged and allowed by the courts, which ultimately is a violation of the 14th Amendment of due process and the 6th Amendment, a right to counsel.
Many guardianship’s begin during a process called Emergency Temporary Guardianship.
This happens when someone, anyone, comes to the court and makes accusations that some elderly person is in imminent danger. No attempt is made by the court to verify in any way that these allegations are true. ETG should be illegal for they are the number one reason why the elderly are rendered with no civil rights. ETG strips civil rights away without due process, which leaves the elderly without the assurance of legal counsel.
Very often elderly people have proper documentation and pre-need directives but the courts routinely ignore or refuse to admit these documents.
The Courts are violating the following Elder’s Constitutional Rights:
The 1st Amendment Right to Freedom of Religion, of Speech, of the Press, to Petition
and to Assemble:
The Constitutional Right to Freedom of Religion is being abused by the Courts in forced guardianship cases, as the guardians prevent the elderly from practicing their respected religion in their chosen houses of worship (Synagogue, Churches, Mosque, etc.), a violation of the Florida Statute 744.3215. The elderly are also denied the right to socialize and to congregate with their family and friends. The Courts have denied the elder’s Rights of Freedom of Speech while in the majority cases the elderly people are kept out of the courtrooms by the Guardians, denying their Right to Counsel and denying their Rights to the Courts. In the majority of these guardianship cases, the court-appointed counsel has represented the guardian previously or works together and is only their representing the Ward to ensure he/she does not have legitimate counsel that will fight for her freedom.
The 4th Amendment Right to Unreasonable Search and Seizures
The 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution gives Americans, including the elderly people, the Right to Privacy in their own homes. Guardians violate this Constitutional Right by seizing elders’ assets, selling their personal property, their homes, their jewelry, etc. If the elder has a large sum of money, the guardian will force the elder, against his/her will, to have a stranger or an ‘aide’ live in their home, charging them well over one hundred thousand dollars per year, instead of allowing a family member to care for the elderly for free. In many cases these strangers steal many belongings from the elderly. The elderly have no rights to the Courts, so they are powerless to do anything.
The 5th and 14th Amendment The Right of Due Process
The Courts violate the Elder Rights of Due Process. In over 97 % of these cases, the Courts are ordering these elderly people into forced guardianship against their will, when these people are fully competent to determine who they wish to care for them. In 1989 the Associated Press did a study of 2200 guardianship cases with the American Bar Association in which they clearly stated that these elderly people were very competent to determine who they wanted as guardians, which normally was a family member, but were denied by the courts. The Court appointed attorneys are not representing their clients, but taking these cases to ensure that these elderly people are remanded into the guardianship cases to be stripped of all their assets. In over a five year study of these guardianship cases, the court appointed attorney had a conflict of interest and should not have taken the guardianship case to represent the ward or the guardian. (For example, the attorney is representing the guardian in one case and at the same time he is also representing the ward in another case, who is adverse to that same guardian, which is a conflict of interest and a violation of the Florida Rules Regulating the Florida Bar 4-1.7.) This is a common practice which taints the entire capacity proceedings in favor of the Guardians and Attorneys to strip the elderly of all their assets.

The 6th Amendment The Right Counsel
The elderly are being forced to use court-appointed attorneys. The elder is then ruled incapacitated, stripped of all civil rights and denied the right to hire his/her own attorney. The elder is rendered helpless, with no attorney to speak for them. Congressman Claude Pepper stated: “It is a National Disgrace…that once you’re in a guardianship, it is almost impossible to get them out.”
The 7th Amendment The Right to a Jury
Since 1982 the guardianship program has failed horribly, destroying lives in the process.
In thousands of guardianship cases few, if any, elderly people were ever afforded a right to a trial by jury. The court-appointed attorney never informs the elderly person of his/her right to a jury trial.
The main power point: Judges are allowing hearings via their "roll call" and exparte petitions which set in motion the ability of probate judges to rule immediately or set a 5 minute hearing whereby the petitioner asks for a person of "age" to be placed into an ETG, thereby remanding the elder to be classified legally an AIP. These hearings are done without the potential "ward" ever being notified legally, therefore NO due process. The potential ward is being placed into the AIP status rendering them with fewer rights than felons on death row. They are stripped of their rights BEFORE they even have an appearance before the court. This unconstitutional act by the judges must be abolished immediately. Once the rights have been stripped, the "ward" is subjected to medical interviews, ordered by the court using tainted court "pools" of so called professionals. These unannounced interviews are NOT being monitored or acknowledged to the Apathies report is then used against the AIP to adjudicate their "incapacitated" status at another 5 minute hearing where again the AIP is almost NEVER allowed to attend and the process is facilitated by the complicit consent of the "court appointed" attorney ad item who is not truly representing the wishes of the ward.
In conclusion, this is the GREATEST SINGLE ABUSE OF CIVIL RIGHTS which
has affected our Parent’s generation, but will affect all generations to come. This statute is
Unconstitutional and has already destroyed many elderly lives and their families. Please allow
us to present our case to you, please, before my mother dies and becomes another
victim of premature death by chemical poisoning. We all believe in CHANGE but I need your
Help, please meet with us A.S.A.P. Robert Sarhan, M.D. 305-338-6160
THE ENTIRE PROCESS FROM START TO FINISH IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
LINKS:

1. Abuses in Guardianship of the Elderly and Infirm: A National Disgrace. A Report by the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Health and Long-Term Care of the Select Committee on Aging. House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, First Session.
http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED294080&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED294080

2. The Elderly in Guardianship: A Crisis of Constitutional Proportions - Mark D. Andrews. The guardianship system is in a state of crisis as it continues to ...
elderlaw.law.uiuc.edu/issues/vol_5/num_1/ - 10k


3. Stolen Lives Thousands of older Americans are being robbed of their freedom, dignity, and life savings by a legal system created for their protection. ...
www.barryyeoman.com/articles/guardian.html - 33k - Cached - Similar pages

4. The Gulag of Guardianship The legal system that is supposed to protect our frail elderly is a national disgrace. All too often it strips them of their rights and leaves them open to financial abuse.
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_archive/1989/03/01/84988/index.htm


5. ESTATE OF DENIAL

http://us.mg3.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.rand=eumdc17s15tka


6. Associated Press 1987, Guardianships in America, A National Disgrace
www.anthrosource.net/doi/abs/10.1525/pol.1994.17.2.65

7. National Association to stop guardian abuse
http://nasga-stopguardianabuse.blogspot.com/

8. National association to stop elderly abuse and exploitation
www.guardianabuse.blogspot.com
THANK YOU,
ROBERT SARHAN, MD AND BONNIE REITER

At What Age Should The Judge Take Away Your Civil Rights 70,75,80

At what age shall I take your Civil Rights away? 70, 75, How about 80?



If it were up to the Judge's, Attorney's and Guardian's here in Miami Dade County, Florida they will strip you of all of your Civil Rights and put you in a Plenary Guardianship immediately, so they can fill their pockets with your money.



Ladies and Gentleman, I spend my time trying to inform you of the crimes that are taking place against the elderly here in Miami Dade County and South Florida. I am providing you with information, so you do not become a victim of Elderly Abuse and Exploitation. The Predators that prey on the elderly are your Probate Judge's, they are the ones that will violate your Constitutional Rights of Due Process and force you into a guardianship against your will. It will happen so fast, that you will not have the proper time to react. Before you know it, you will be able to look back and see that not only was the Judge making fraudulent decisions to ensure the professional guardian gets the case, instead of a family member, but you will be rest assured that your Constitutional Rights will be violated and you must act with days, even before you go to court. For example those three people that go to your house to see whether your are competent or capacitated, you will be ruled incapacitated, everyone is, especially those with money. How can you prevent this, don't open the door. Talk to your personal doctor, have people in the room with you at all times if they do get into your home. Don't ever let them do this without you having your own tape recorder. Have your own doctors not only write a letter that you are competent but he must also come to court. Whe you go into the court, take your own attorney that you know well, if you do not know of an attorney then don't hire one, most of these attorney's are dirty and have been corrupted, so your own attorney will sell you out. Even if you have to get an attorney from out of State get, this will be your most important step, when you hire an attorney. (most attorney's here in Miami will sell you out).

Judge Norman Gerstein Allows Elderly People to be Abused and Exploited in his Courtroom

Baby Boomers watch out, the legal system of Judge's Attorney's and Guardian's want your money and they will do whatever they can to get your money. The Courtroom is nothing less than a Mockery of Justice, so prepare now so you do not become a victim. * Judge Norman Gerstein took over a fraudulent guardianship case and continued to allow the elderly person to lose all of her assets. While the case was under investigation, Norman Gerstein allows large somes of money to be extorted from the then 74 year old, Yvonne Sarhan, the victim. After the investigators found that Yvonne Sarhan Constitutional Rights were violated and that this case should be dismissed, Norman Gerstein, delayed proper procedure and swept the fraudulent activity under the rug. Gerstein stated, " He would have to check with the Florida Bar to see if this were a confilct of Interest, he never came back with an answer, but dropped out of the case. After a two year investigation we found that Judge Bruce Levy violated Yvonne Sarhan's Constitutional Rights of Due Process by allowing Enrique Zamora to represent Yvonne Sarhan when he was already representing the Emergency Temporary Guardian, Barbra Resier, an adverse party. Even after Yvonne Sarhan was ruled competent by Dr. Mario Sanchez Martinez and Dr. David Racher, Judge Bruce Levey stated, "She is not competent until I say she is competent, her rights are denied." Judge Norman Gerstein takes over the case after Judge Bruce Levy recuses himself and one Judge just supports the others, "The Good Old Boy System." Miami Dade County could be the most corrupt courthouse in the country, but I continue to fight for my mother's freedom and I ask for your help. Please lets call the new Judge Muir 305-349-7105 and tell her to release Yvonne Sarhan, the case is a fraud, Chief Judge Farina 305-349-7054, and Governor Charlie Christ 850-488-5603 and ask Charlie Christ, why don't you stop elderly abuse and exploitation here in the State of Florida.
Tags: ireport_for_cnn, cnn, obama, obama_administration, oprah, larry_king, lou_dobbs, barack, barack_obama, ireport
In response to assignment: iReport for CNN

Zamora, Hillman & Veres, Attorneys at Law

Zamora, Hillman & Veres, Attorneys at Law are Unethical Attorney's Beware

Enrique Zamora was representing my mother, Yvonne Sarhan and at the sametime was representing his client Barbra Reiser, yes, a conflict of Interest. Enrique Zamora denied representing my mother and the guardian of my mother at the same time committing Fraud on the Court. Enrique Zamora help destroy my mother's life and my life as well. You see my mother Yvonne Sarhan was forced into a guardianship case, ruled incapacitated, and now the guardians,, Barbra Reiser, Vicki Brail and Attorney's Cheryl Silverman, Bonnie Cooper, Enrique Zamora, Charle Veres are stealing all her money and now her home. It is simple, the courtroom is nothing less than a mockery, the Judge's here in the Probate Court here in Miami Florida work along with the guardian's and attorney's to assist in the theft. Where in this country could an attorney represent a Plantiff and a Defendant at the same time, they can't. The same for Zamora could not legally represent my mother because he was already representing Barbra Reiser, hi client. Charles Veres was also representing my mother and throughout the whole year, Enrique Zamora and Charles Veres would not write one legal brief to protect my mother's Civil Rights. Cheryl Silverman was representing my brother who is an adverse party (meaning my mother did not want him to care for her she wanted me) and at the same time was representing Barbra Reiser. So how could this happen in a court of law, the Judge's are involved their is no other answer. Chief Judge Joseph Farina knows this happening, I talked to him and he says, I cannot help you, I am just an administrator. We went to Congressman Mario Diaz Balart he said, I am not a plumber, "I cannot come over and fix your plumbing". Yet when I talked with Lincoln Diaz Balart, he knew exaqctly what was going on in my mother's case and stated, " they rule the eldelry incapacitated, steal all their money, their homes and dump them in nursing homes to die. So if you want to hire Enrique Zamora or Charles Veres, Cheryl Silverman, Bonnie Cooper, Beware they lie in court and they will try to steal every dime you have...

Citizens' Forum On Judicial Accountability

Some of the world's most prominent government whistleblowers and human rights activists will gather during the week of May 11-18, 2008 in Washington, D. C. to lobby Congress and alert the public to the need to support whistleblower protection. Part of this momentous occasion will be a historical, Citizens' Forum On Judicial Accountability.

The one (1) day event will entail an academic debate on the proper scope of judicial accountability for U. S. state and federal judges; testimony from a pre-selected panel of American citizens, apparently deprived of a fair and impartial forum for addressing their judicial misconduct allegations and/or impacted by a corresponding chilling effect ( learn more ); and the viewing of a videographed call for congressional investigation of plights facing judicial whistleblowers in America by former constitutional law professor and renowned civil rights activist, attorney Thomas N. Todd. All panelists will be guests at a mid-day luncheon.

Judges Not Inmune fromAbuse of Power

The exercise of the enormous power of summary contempt requires strict compliance with statutory safeguards, including giving the accused an appropriate warning and the opportunity to desist from the supposedly contumacious conduct and preparing an order setting forth the basis for the ruling (Jud Law §§750, 755; Doyle v. Aison, 216 AD2d 634 [3d Dept 1995], lv den 87 NY2d 807 [1996]; Loeber v. Teresi, 256 AD2d 747 [3d Dept 1998]). Here, respondent not only wielded the power without reasonable basis, but failed to adhere to mandated procedures. Such conduct constitutes an abuse of the summary contempt power and warrants discipline. Matter of Teresi, 2002 Annual Report 163 (Comm. on Judicial Conduct); Matter of Meacham, 1994 Annual Report 87 (Comm. on Judicial Conduct); Matter of Recant, 2002 Annual Report 139 (Comm. on Judicial Conduct).

As an experienced judge, respondent should be familiar with statutory procedures and should understand that his duty to act in a patient, neutral, judicious manner must always take precedence over impulses arising from personal pique or offense. Here, respondent’s disregard of due process in both matters resulted in a travesty of justice and was inconsistent with the fair and proper administration of justice.

By reason of the foregoing, the Commission determines that the appropriate sanction is censure.

Mr. Goldman, Judge Ciardullo, Mr. Coffey, Ms. DiPirro, Mr. Emery, Mr. Felder, Ms. Hernandez, Judge Peters, Mr. Pope and Judge Ruderman concur as to respondent’s misconduct, except that Mr. Goldman, Judge Ciardullo, Mr. Coffey and Mr. Pope dissent as to Charge I, paragraph 5, alleging that respondent failed to prepare a mandate as required by law, and vote to dismiss the allegation.

Mr. Goldman, Judge Ciardullo, Mr. Coffey, Ms. Hernandez, Judge Peters, Mr. Pope and Judge Ruderman concur as to the sanction and vote that respondent be censured. Ms. DiPirro, Mr. Emery and Mr. Felder dissent as to the sanction and vote that respondent be removed from office.

Tyrants come in more varieties than Baskin-Robbins has flavors. The ultimate protection a free society has against a tyrant, is a judicial system that acts as the last barrier to a tyrant’s will. Therefore, it is immeasurably worse when the tyrant is the judge himself. Our sensibilities are even more offended at a time when our treasure and youth have been spent to remove a far-away tyrant on the simple premise that in the modern world, the velocity of events is such that evil in one place eventually becomes evil touching everyplace. Just as there is no small death, there is no small tyranny.

Respondent acted in tyrannical fashion. His will was the law, and to the degree that his law conflicted with the actual one, he was above the law.

I strongly believe that respondent is not fit to remain a judge. Arrogance and narcissism are not uncommon human qualities, but this judge’s sense of self is so inflated that he chose to fuel his ego by burning the fundamental rights of citizens in his courtroom. I can think of no greater transgression by a jurist entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring that justice is dispensed with basic fairness. Respondent is not just an embarrassment to his fellow jurists. He is dangerous, and he should be removed.

Source =>>

PREDATORS AT LAW, FRAUDULENT GUARDIANSHIP SCAMS

INVOLVE DR. MARIO SANCHEZ MARTINEZ
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI PSYCHIATRIST

The Predators that Prey on the Elderly are Attorney's, Enrique Zamora, Charles Veres, Cheryl Silverman, David Mangeiro, Bonnie Cooper, Brian Silverio, Harvey Rogers; Guardians Barbra Reiser and Gay Activist Vicki Brail; Judge's are Bruce Levy, Norman Gerstein, Maria Korvick, Arthur Rothenberg, Herbert Stetin, Philip Cook. Doctors: Dr. Mario Sanchez Martinez. These are officers of the court that have violated my mother's civil rights to steal our family's assets of approximately one and a half million dollars. Now if you multiply this times 50 victims per year, this is big money, and is their motive Kathleen Rundle and Mr. Centerino from the State Attoney's Office. Even the Chief Judge Joseph Farina know these crimes are occurring and does nothing.

The Predators that Prey on the Elderly are the same people that are supposed to protect them. The Judge's, Attorney's and Guardian's are all working together to Rule Elderly People Incompetent, To Steal Their Money. None of these crimes against the Elderly could take place without the Judge's Participation. The Judge's are Violating their Oath of Office, Violating the Elderly People's Civil Rights to live in Peace in Freedom. The Judge's have blatantly cross the line and would be charged with Racketeering, if the State Attorney, Kathleen Rundle would Just do her Job. I am not speaking for myself only, their are many victims here in Miami-Dade Probate Court. We have many victims daily comming forward, we want Elderly Abuse and Exploitation to stop, we want the Gaurdianship Program in the State of Florida Abolished. This Program is so Infiltrated with crime by the top members, Enrique Zamora, Barbra Reiser and Vicki Brail just to say a few names, this website is intended to Stop Crimes Against the Elderly People of Florida and around the Country, including My Mother Yvonne Sarhan.

My name is Robert Sarhan, MD, My mother has been held in a forced guardianship case for the past five years. I must first say that my mother, Yvonne Sarhan was fully competent, however, anyone with money will be ruled incompetent. All the people that I mention in this document are involved in a criminal conspiracy to rule Elderly People Incompetent to Steal their Money.

Many people that read this document and see the names of these people may be shocked, these people have infiltrated themselves in the community well. Many of these people are lawyers and judge's, however let me please remind you that "No one is above the law." I am writing this story, so I can possible prevent others lives from being destroyed and becoming victims of Guardianship Abuse and Guardianship Fraud. I am in the middle writing about our case the guardianship of Yvonne Sarhan(below) but I think it would be more important if I let you know who these Predators are, so you can better protect yourself.

This is how the Guardianship scam works. First, their is absolutely nothing legal about guardianships here in South Florida and Miami Dade County. Just because a Judge from the Probate Division signs an order, it does not make it legal. The fact is that Judge Bruce Levy, Judge Norman Gerstein, Judge Arthur Rothenberg all removed themselves from case for good reason, to protect themselves. The fact is My mother, Yvonne Sarhan case is so corrupt that it is not possible for the Judge's to be innocent or was just rubber stamping, no way. These Judge's and Judge Maria Korvick have involved themselves, with the Attorneys and Guardians in a devious scheme to rob the elderly out of their life savings their homes and their lives. Quite simple, the Judge's do not follow the law, they believe this is their courtroom and they can do whatever they wish. The Florida Statutes are not being followed and as you will soon see that this Corruption, Elderly Abuse and Exploitation, Guardianship Fraud, Guardianship Abuse could not be accomplished without the Judge's Participation. (Note: Judge Muir is fairly new to the Probate Court, I have absolutely no evidence that she is Corrupt, so please lets not condemn all Judges, because we all know their are good and bad in every profession.)

For whatever reason, usually an unsuccessful family member brings this case into the court. Usually this person is upset because the parent chose another family member to care for them and their property and all they want is the money. This is not about family problems or sibling rivalry, absolutely not. This is the Guardians excuse but far from the truth and far from legal.

This about Judge's, Attorneys and Guardian's ruling Elderly people incompetent, even though they are fully competent, to steal their money.

I have followed numerous cases over the past five years and all these cases have the same motive, the same attorneys, the same guardians, the same judge's, only the names of the victims are changed. These Predators do not only Prey of The Elderly, they prey on the family members fighting for the freedom of their mothers. These are ruthless people with no heart, no soul, no conscious, no morals, no ethics, and these people have kidnapped my mother for the past 5 years and stole approximately 700,000 dollars from myself and my mother.

My mother Yvonne Sarhan stood up in Court stating, " Your Honor if I have to have a guardian I want my son Robert, he is a medical doctor and he is a very loving and caring child." Judge Bruce Levy asked, why don't you want your son Tony, my mother stated, "My son Tony has a lot of problems." First of all, does this answer sound like my mother was incompetent, absolutely not, she was fully competent and I was never going to be my mother's guardians because, Barbra Reiser, my mothers Emergency Temporary Guardian was going to ensure that we will be railroaded into such a corrupt racketeering ring that because of the Judge's participation, even if we are legally right, the judge still rules against you. Soon you will see.

I hired Harvey Rogers to represent me, because Barbra Reiser stated I had to have an attorney to be my mothers guardian. Well, everyone where I worked thought, your a medical doctor working for the Federal Government, how could you lose, Watch.

On August 5, 2003, My attorney Harvey Rogers lied to me and my wife and stated congratulations you are now the guardian of your mother, but Judge Bruce Levy ordered you to put the house into your mothers name. He got angry when we questioned him and we signed under duress and coercion. To this day I am still fighting Harvey Rogers and it is amazing we had proof that this lawyer lied on the day of the May 16, 2007 hearing and the Judge's rule in his favor anyhow, so the corruption is not only about the Probate Judge's but extends to other Judge's, Judge Teretha Thomas and Judge Kravitz who ordered me to pay this attorney when she held documents in her hand which shows Harvey Rogers committed Extrinsic Fraud.

Barbra Reiser's Attorney David Mangeiro is important to take note, because David Mangeiro is involved with Zamora, Reiser, Gay Activist Brail, Cooper, Veres, Rogers and more will will come. You see I mentioned David Mangeiro because he talked with Harvey Rogers to get Rogers to lie to me to get me to sign the home that my mother gave me into her name so they can steal the home, which they are doing now. It was all a set up and all fraud and I hope with my partners and attorneys working together we will end guardianship fraud together.

So they lied to me, they got the house all the money and I continue to fight for my mother in the guardianship court and Federal Court. October 28, 2003 Barbar Resier writes a report which looks like a 5th grader wrote, and states so many contradictions and Judge Bruce Levy stated this is the best report I have ever read, which I do not believe he read at all. However, the report was written to back up the Judge to give guardianship to local Gay Activist Vicki Brail. remember, the Judge's Attorneys and Guardians all working together as a team to rob the elderly, I believe this is what the government calls Racketeering, however, we can't get Kathline Rundle to stop the crime, she looks the other way, she knows these crimes against the elderly are being committed but she is protecting her friends, see Florida Statute 825.103. To do what these Predators are doing to my mother is a crime 825.103 so why doesn't the State Attorney Prosecute?

Let me tell you all the conflicts, Barbra Reiser was my mothers temporary Guardian,
Enrique Zamora was my mother's attorney
Enrique Zamora was Barbra Reisers attorney also, at the same
time in the case of Laurie Savage
David Mangeiro represented Barbra Reiser
Vicki Brail is my mothers permanent Guardian
Bonnie Cooper is Vicki Brails attorney
Cheryl Silverman represents Tony Sarhan, Yvonne's and
Roberts adverse party
Cheryl Silverman represents Barbra Reiser also during the
sametime period as she represents Tony Sarhan our
adverse party
Cheryl Silverman represents Vicki Brail and Tony Sarhan at the
sametime
Barbra Reiser uses Enrique Zamora as a personal reference on
her application for guardianship of my mother
Vicki Brail uses Cheryl Silverman and Enrique Zamora as
personal reference on her application for Guardianship of my mother


There is more, However if you see these attorneys and guardians in your cases, the case is most likely fraudulent, because these attorneys and guardians, are working in numerous cases together, this is why we call this Racketeering and if the State Attorney would do her job, she would charge them with Title 18, 1962 & 1964 Racketeering. However, since these are attorneys and guardians, they are being protected. Numerous victims have gone to Kathleen Rundle and the Corruptions Department Mr Centerino and they refuse to prosecute these criminals. However, Kathleen Rundle goes after inspectors taking a bribe, but not after Judges Attorneys and Guardians robbing the elderly, amazing. If you go into the Probate Court here in Miami, the Judge's, Attorney"s and Guardian's are so Blatant about these crimes, they don't try to hide it, because they know Katleen Rundle looks the other way, while the families suffer.

So how was I going to win if my mother's attorney Zamora was representing the guardian and my mother. Zamora did not write one motion in support of my mothers wishes. Zamora was brought into the case to ensure my mother did not have legal representation. Zamora did not file an objection to Barbra Reiser's fraudulent report, because he would be fighting his own client. The Florida Bar, Arlene Sankel states, Zamora did nothing wrong, we are all not as stupid as you think Ms Sankle. My own attorney Harvey Rogers joined the other side, sold out his client and did not file an objection to Reiser Fraudulent report either.

On December 2, 2003, my own attorney Harvey Rogers fails to show up to the hearing for permanent guardian appointment. Later Rogers stated he did not show up because I told him not too. If this were true, why did Harvey Rogers send me two letters before the hearing and after the hearing stating, how would you like to proceed. Local Gay Activist Vicki Brail was named permanent Guardian.

I started reading the law books at the University of Miami, my only mistake, I should have read them 3 months before this case ever started.

I filed a suggestion of Capacity on February 5, 2004 and on March 10, 2004, I took my mother to the Court Appointed Psychiatrist and Dr. Mario Sanchez Martinez at the University of Miami ruled my mother competent. Nine days later, I took my mother to DR. David Racher a Board Certified Neurologist at Baptist Hospital and this doctor ruled my mother competent with good judgment and Insight at this time. We then went back to court and I requested my mothers rights restored and I ask Judge Bruce Levy, can you please give my mothers rights back, both doctors ruled my mother competent? Judge Bruce Levy stated, "she is not competent until I say she is competent, denied." Judge Bruce Levy Recuses himself 2 weeks later.

Can you believe the criminal behavior that takes place in the court, please read on, now we are going to see who joins the group of Corrupt Judge's Corrupt Attorneys, Corrupt Guardians and now Corrupt Doctors, yes I am sorry to say.

On August 3, 2004, their was an evidentiary hearing, it was nothing less than a mockery and the Judge Shapiro who passed away that year was definitely involved in this corruption. The judge allowed my mother to be shoved in a corner and then Bonnie Cooper put her chair in front of my mother, I could not believe this was happening it was a joke and a miscarriage of Justice. The abuse that they put my mother through was something that I have to bear the pain for the rest of my life. Dr Mario Sanchez Martinez calls in on the phone for the hearing, Dr. Martinez stated that Yvonne is incompetent, what? He ruled my mother competent in March 2004 what happened? I crossed examine the doctor when it was my turn and I had brought the Neurologist in to the hearing to testify in my mothers behalf.

I asked Dr. Martinez, when is the first time you seen my mother, he said October 2003. At that time I knew Dr. Martinez was lying so I continued, and I asked was she competent and he said yes. However, the first time he seen my mother was March 10, 2004. So I asked, when is the next time you seen my mother, he said June 2004. I asked so your absolutely sure you seen her in October of 2003, he sadi yes. So then you seen her again in june of 2004 and you ruled her incompetent, yes he said. I asked him, Dr. Martinez, why are you lying, you never seen my mother in October 2003, the first time you seen her was on March 10 2004 so for what other reason for fowl play would you see my mother 2 months later. So you see, the guardians or attorneys paid or told Dr. Martinez you have to change your report to incompetent, although I have never seen the new report. So my mother was ruled competent on March 10 2004 and Dr. Martinez stated October so he could show a longer time span for my mother to lose her competency, so the guardians and attorneys can steal her money. Dr. Mario Sanchez Martinez ruled my mother competent on March 10, 2004 and the guardains made him change the report, however I have never seen the report, but I have the old one he signed stated she was competent. So you see the web gets bigger and now you have the original doctors that go out to the house that falsify reports and now a Board Certified Psychiatrist at the University of Miami falsifies his testimony. It really diod not matter that I brought this neurologist, as long as the Judges Are corrupt, you will never win even if you are legally right. Cooper wrote an order for me and my son who was just born weere no longer aloud to see my mother, my mother was thereby deprived of her right to see her own grandson for 15 months.

Judge Norman Gerstein takes over the case. In April of 2005, after a careful invesigation in other guardianship cases, with other victims, we found all the conflicts of interest in the above. So I filed a motion to remove guardians on grounds of Conflicts of Interest. I thought Jackpot. How could anyone lose this, watch. Judge Norman Gerstein refused to hear my motion, I filed on June 8, 2005 he refued to hear muy motion and wanted my mother reevaluated by a doctor, why? Their was no reason, we stated that my mother did not have the right of due process becasue Zamora was representing my mother and the guardian of my mother at the same time. We had to wait till January 9, 2006 7 months later.

On January 9, 2006, Judge Norman Gerstein tried to shut me up and I stated on record, that Enrique Zamora was representing my mother and the guardian of my mother at the same time. My mother did nit have the right of due process and my mother is entitled to get her rights back. Juidge Norman Gerstein stated, "well Dr. Sarhan, I will have to check with the Florida Bar to see if this is a conflict of Interest and he ended the hearing. Three months later, we had another hearing and Judge Norman Gerstein stated to my attorney Howard Scott, I ruled against your client, why didn't you sign the order, Howard Scott stated, "you were going to check with the Florida Bar to see if this was a conflict of Interest, he said but I ruled against your client.
I will check with the Bar Counsel, I tried to speak and he stated, I already ruled. If Judge Norman Gerstein has to check with the Florida Bar, to see if Zamora who was representing my mother and the guardian of my mother at the sametime, then he should get a job at publics because when I told the young lady cashier she stated that is a conflict of interest. Remember, Cheryl Siolverman was representing my mothers guardian Barbra Reiser and Vicki Brail at the same time she was representing our adverse party. Two weeks later Norman Gerstein recuses himself off my case.

Guardians are supposed to be a neutral party, in this case guardians were not neutral because they both used Cheryl Silverman as an attorney as my brother who brought this case into the court, another conflcit, to many conflcits and the same in many of these cases.

Note: Zamora, Reiser, Brail,, Silverman, Mangeiro, Cooper, Vers and may others new about these conflicts and as officers of the court had to come forward with these conflcits and failed to do so, to continue to defraud my mother and myself out of one and a half million dollars.

Judge Arthur Rothenberg, refuses to hear our motions. We file an appeal. However, they file an exparte order and state I am not an interested party, which is illegal but Judge Rothenberg signs anything the guardians put s in front of him. From here on out I stayed out of court because the Judge states I am noit an interested party, howevre the Florida Suprmem Court states different. Like I said these Judge's are corrupt and belong in prison but the state attorneyis protecting them, this is why they continue to rob the elderly and destroy so many lives.

In short, we have a new judge, I will pray she will be strong enough for her to give my mother back to me before they try to kill her. They put my mother on Seroquel used for Schizophrenia and Bipolar disorders, It states on the insert, it shoudl not be used by the elderly and can cause sudden death. My mother does not have Schizophrenia or Bipolar disorder. If they kill my mother I don't know what I will do. These Officers of the Court have destroyed so many lives. The Judges abuse theri power yet, the State Attorney looks the other way. Miami Dade Police Corruption states, " we know their is a problem, but what can we do if the State Attorney refuses to Prosectute this Judge's attorneys and Guardians. The Governor of the State of Florida Charlie Christ, Congressman Lincoln Diaz Balart, Congressman Mario Diaz Balart, Department of Elder Affairs and Kathleen Rundles office know these crimes are taking place and allow the crimes to continue, their is no Justice here in Miami dadae County. If the State Attporney won't prosecute than the Judges have nothing to fear. Our Go=vernor, Our attorney General knows these crimes are taking place against these vulnerable elderly people and they look the other way, so what do we do? Please write the Governor of the State of Florida, write Kathleen Rundkle and your State Senators and tell them we want the Judge's Attorneys and Guardians put in Jail , the guardianship business closed down permanentlyand the crimes against the elderly stopped. We want our elderly people to live their life in peace without the threat of Predators like these Predators you have read in my story, Thank You for Reading

There are many cases here in Miami, where good caring daughter and sons are being denied to care for their mother until the Judges, Attorneys and Guardians steal all their money, then they give back the mother, who traumatized and abused, all for the love of MONEY.

rsarhan@bellsouth.net