Saturday, April 19, 2008

Dr. Robert Sarhan Gets His Day In Court


- Miami, Florida USA.

Well, did Dr. Robert Sarhan get his day in Court on April 17,2004? -

{"Dr. Robert Sarhan was very well prepared for this hearing and we will make his briefs available for your viewing as soon as they become available to us."}

Dr. Sarhan was thrown a "vicious curve-ball" right off the bat, as Dr. Sarhan was told that the Appellate Court was subject to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure specifically (3) Motions relating to oral argument, rule 9.320.


RULE 9.320. ORAL ARGUMENT - Oral argument may be permitted in any proceeding. A request for oral argument shall be a separate document served by a party not later than the time the last brief of that party is due.


[Each side will be allowed 20 minutes for oral argument, except in capital cases in which each side will be allowed 30 minutes.] On its own motion or that of a party, the court may require, limit, expand, or dispense with oral argument.

Dr. Sarhan was under the impression that he had 20 minutes as stated in the rules 9.320,
but Dr. Sarhan soon found that the judge only allowed him 10 minutes.

He said that he had prepared for the twenty minutes allotted to present his oral argument, and the Honorable Judges (3) said; "Not in this court", "Maybe in the 3rd District Court of Appeals, but not here"! and then proceeded to walk out on Dr. Sarhan while he was still making his argument.

Dr. Sarhan was surrounded by other elders who felt that they have been victimized by the system as well, and several senior members of E.A. were also present to show him support.

Dr. Sarhan was objecting to a $15,000 legal bill on behalf of his attorney Harvey Rogers. The bill started out at 1500 and grew to 15,000 which is under dispute. Does this mean if an attorney lies to his client, destroys his case on purpose, committing Extrinsic Fraud, sold his client out to the opposing party, never shows up to court, and I still have to pay his fees.

Attorney Harvey D. Rogers seemed very upset at being brought up on this matter, and was shocked to see so many supporters present for Dr. Sarhan's hearing.

So much so, that as we were all walking toward the elevator, Harvey D. Rogers started yelling at the ladies that came to show their support for Dr. Sarhan, and to support their own cause to end Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation.

Harvey D. Rogers started calling these elderly ladies names, he used the word "trash" on more than several occasions, and also continued saying "What a Bunch of Jerks."

One of the elderly ladies present took offense to the rude comments and said;


- Miami, Florida USA.


Well, did Dr. Robert Sarhan get his day in Court on April 17,2004? -

{"Dr. Robert Sarhan was very well prepared for this hearing and we will make his briefs available for your viewing as soon as they become available to us."}

Dr. Sarhan was thrown a "vicious curve-ball" right off the bat, as Dr. Sarhan was told that the Appellate Court was subject to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure specifically (3) Motions relating to oral argument, rule 9.320.

RULE 9.320. ORAL ARGUMENT - Oral argument may be permitted in any proceeding. A request for oral argument shall be a separate document served by a party not later than the time the last brief of that party is due.

[Each side will be allowed 20 minutes for oral argument, except in capital cases in which each side will be allowed 30 minutes.] On its own motion or that of a party, the court may require, limit, expand, or dispense with oral argument.

Dr. Sarhan was under the impression that he had 20 minutes as stated in the rules 9.320,
but Dr. Sarhan soon found that the judge only allowed him 10 minutes.

He said that he had prepared for the twenty minutes allotted to present his oral argument, and the Honorable Judges (3) said; "Not in this court", "Maybe in the 3rd District Court of Appeals, but not here"! and then proceeded to walk out on Dr. Sarhan while he was still making his argument.

Dr. Sarhan and several families from different organizations such as The National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse (NASGA) and other independent observers.
In Dr's Sarhan own words, a description of what took place;
"He stated, "congratulations you are now the guardian of your mother but Judge Bruce Levy ordered you to sign this quit claim deed, deeding my home that my mother gave me into the guardianship of my mother. In October we found out that Rogers lied, we never won the Guardianship case of my mother and the Judge never ordered us to sign a quit claim deed."

"Rogers never objected to the fraudulent report that Barbra Reiser wrote and he never showed up to court of December 2, 2003 for whom would be the permanent guardian of my mother, for reasons of why I hired him. "
It is amazing to me, if I were to lie in court as much as Harvey Rogers, I would be held in contempt and jailed for 6 months at minimum. However, Rogers lies to his client, lies to the Judges and the Florida Bar does absolutely nothing, but protect the attorneys who lie and destroy their clients cases.

Here on May 16, 2007, Harvey Rogers stated that he did not receive my motion until yesterday by express mail, which would of been May 15, 2007. However, Harvey Rogers lied to Judge Thomas, at that very moment I had the United States Post Office tracking report stating that he recieved my motion on May 14, 2007 at 3:25 p.m.. He lied so that the Judge would throw out my motion for not being timely, and she did refuse to hear my motion. However, the tracking report showed that Rogers lied committing Fraud on the Court.
The whole idea is, this lawyers lies constantly in the courtroom and the Judges treats him like his buddy. It seems that the legal system, is not really a legal system at all. You have elderly people being ruled incompetent when they are fully competent, so these attorneys and guardians can steal there money.

I have always said, that the Judge's Attorneys and Guardians are ruling the elderly people incompetent to steal there money, when these vulnerable citizen are very competent. It is a dirty crime by dirty people plagueing this country and I intend to stop this crime. First I will start with my mother and then with every mother in this country.

Please join me and stop elderly abuse and exploitation.


by Dr. R .Sarhan


Attorney Harvey D. Rogers seemed very upset at being brought up on this matter, and was shocked to see so many supporters present for Dr. Sarhan's hearing.

So much so, that as we were all walking toward the elevator, Harvey D. Rogers started yelling at the ladies that came to show their support for Dr. Sarhan, and to support their own cause to end Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation.

Harvey D. Rogers started calling these elderly ladies names, he used the word "trash" on more than several occasions, and also continued saying "What a Bunch of Jerks."

One of the elderly ladies present took offense to the rude comments and said; "I rather be a jerk than a thief", at which Mr. Harvey D. Rogers seem to be in fear of the lady in the wheel chair, whose voice was the loudest heard and he proceeded to call for police officers to escort him out of the building.

Of course this was a waste of taxpayers money, as the hearing was unfairly shortened on time, and the childish tantrum that Mr. Harvey D. Rogers threw, both actions were not worthy of the decorum of a professional in a Higher Court.

It was clear to all, that the elderly ladies never presented any threats or danger to Mr. Harvey D. Rogers, who was more than provoking and taunting.

Although every single one of these victims has paid ungodly sums of money in legal fees in desperation, thinking that these people (judges) could liberate their parents from the living-hell called "Forced Guardianship," we just may be just that; "Jerks" to believe that the judges would even care.

Do these victims deserve their lives destroyed and their parent's hard earned savings taken away?

Many of them are "barely making ends meet" in taking care of their elder parents, so now when you add to that, the "uncalled for" legal fees, you are commuting a death sentence on the elder and "destroying that elder families," heirs , children and grandchildren, whose lives are often traumatized by the forced and improperly imposed guardianship's.




These ladies are the "S0-Called Jerks" that Attorney Harvey D. Rogers was referring to,..


You can Email Attorney Harvey D. Rogers and let him know how you feel about him calling these sweet ladies "Jerks"- Here: rogerslaw1@aol.com



Please click to enlarge:

DON'T WAIT TO FILE COMPLAINTS AT THE STATE BAR AGAINST ATTORNEYS

By Donie Vanitzian (View author info)

Dogged persistence is the key to filing attorney complaints. Let's face it--attorneys don't want to be scrutinized! Not by the bar. Not by the public. Not by the courts. Not by the media. Not by their clients. Not by opposing counsel.

There is an element of performing an important public service when filing complaints against attorneys that have "acted improperly" (the Bar's words, not mine). Because, in my opinion, the State Bar has failed miserably in policing its own, the public must take pains to make their sentiments known, not once, but over and over and over again without fail.

One way to accomplish that is to file complaints with the State Bar against errant attorneys--and keep filing them.YOU DO NOT HAVE TO HIRE THE ATTORNEY IN ORDER TO FILE A COMPLAINT AGAINST HIM OR HER

This means, if you believe that the association's attorney or the management company's attorney for that matter, has violated rules of professional responsibility, or some other statute, or has been unethical, you CAN file a complaint against that ass attorney or management company attorney with the State Bar.

From the consumer's point of view, the worst that can happen is that the Bar informs you there is no case. But they will READ your complaint and consider it without charging you a fee. This appears to be one time where your tax dollars are at work, take advantage of it.Remember, if the complaint has no merit, the Bar will write you back and tell you.

REGISTERING A COMPLAINT Do not be intimidated. Do not back down. Just do it.Obtain a complaint form from the Bar's website:in California

http://www.calbar.ca.gov/ In Florida Click Here=>>

ARE YOU THE ATTORNEY'S NEW BEST FRIEND?.For every complaint against an attorney that does NOT get filed, you become that attorney's new best friend.

Basically, reasons for not filing complaints against ass attorneys typically amount to a combination of fear and laziness on behalf of the owner. Understandably exhausted from the ordeal leading up to even "considering" the filing of a complaint in the first place, one's hands go up in the air, the file goes in a bottom drawer or in the trash, and such lawyers make a slick getaway.

Waiting to file a complaint at the Bar does not make the situation better. Waiting to file is not the same as waiting for a fine wine to age."Waiting" MAY prejudice you or if there is a statute of limitations, it may run out.

Though not referred to in these terms at the Bar, an unspoken inference might be, you waited so long YOU LOOK GUILTY. "What took you so long to complain?" "Why did you stay with your attorney if you were not happy?" "Why didn't you make your displeasure known to your attorney early on?" "Did you ask your attorney for a refund?" "Why didn't you fire him?"

A QUICK WORD ABOUT THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION"Defending Liberty - Pursuing Justice" is the motto of the American Bar Association. Owners are not limited to filing a complaint only at the State Bar, you can also file a complaint with the American Bar Association (ABA) (http://www.abanet.org

Friday, April 18, 2008

Judicial/Attorney Misconduct*

Following are some of the attorneys, law firms, or judges who have been reported to have been disciplined by the State of Florida for unethical conduct, may reside in the State of Florida but was disciplined in another jurisdiction, indicted, sued for malpractice, arrested, incarcerated, whom we understand have been charged with unethical and/or criminal conduct, have violated the Supreme Law of the Land, have engaged in conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts and the legal business into disrepute, etc.

Here =>>

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Congressman Mario Diaz Balart - Helpless to Assist Abused South Florida Elders?


Congressman Mario Diaz Balart said that Elder Abuse is a "State Matter" but that he was unable to sponsor or write any bills condemning the on-going epidemic of elder abuse that is affecting so many elders in South Florida and in other communities in the Nation.

Elder Financial Abuse is a plight that is spreading throughout all of Florida's communities with an alarming immunity!

Senior members of ElderAbuseHelp.Org accompanied Dr.Robert Sarhan to Congressman Balart's office in Miami, Florida in order to plead for help in his well documented case of elder financial abuse involving his elderly mother.

Dr. Robert Sarhan recently granted ElderAbuseHelp.Org an interview as to the nature and outcome of his meeting with Congressman Mario Diaz Balart, during which the Congressman repeatedly asked Dr. Sarhan; "What do you want me to do ?"

Dr. Sarhan expressively asked the Congressman for E.A. to be present during the meeting and the Congressman denied E.A. access to the meeting and only spoke with Dr. Sarhan.

--------------------------------

E.A. - Good evening Dr. Sarhan, and thank you for granting E.A. an interview with you concerning your recent meeting with Congressman Mario Diaz Balart.

Dr. Sarhan - Thank you, and you are quite welcome.

E.A. - First of all, what was the purpose of your interview with Congressman Balart?

Dr. Sarhan - To make him aware of elderly abuse and guardian exploitation in South Florida as well as around the entire State of Florida, and to discuss with him the fraud and abuse that has been taking place in many local guardianship cases in his district and throughout all of Florida.

I wanted to express to the Congressman the urgency to protect these elderly people from abuse and exploitation here in Miami and to show him what is taking place in our local courts.

I then showed him documents that clearly showed a pattern of racketeering schemes which involved local Judges, Attorneys and Guardians that rule elderly people incompetent so as to steal their money.

I was petitioning the Congressman to take action, as special legislation needs to be made to stop elder guardian abuse and exploitation here in the South Florida.

For instance, in my situation, I showed him documents that clearly proved that my mother, Yvonne Sarhan was forced into a guardianship and her civil rights were taken away from her.

I told Congressman Balart that her guardian case needs to end and that my mothers civil rights need to be restored, especially since she was deemed competent by several court appointed professionals and yet she remains in a forced guardianship.

I spent almost an hour explaining the evidence to the Congressman that the Judges, Attorneys and Guardians are all working together to extort millions of dollars from elderly people and I showed the Congressman documentation to back up that up.

E.A. - Dr. Sarhan, how much time did you spend trying to get a meeting with Congressman Balart?

Dr. Sarhan - I have been trying to work with his office for over two and a half to three years to try to get help from his office in order to help my mother get out of her improperly established Guardianship and to restore her civil rights.

When I first contacted him, he only wrote a couple of letters to Katherine Fernandez Rundle, of the State Attorneys office, which in my opinion has clearly accomplished nothing since there has been nothing done about this serious issue as of yet.

E. A. - When you were finally granted a meeting with Congressman Mario Diaz Balart, did you feel that ElderAbuseHelp.Org was instrumental in obtaining your interview with the Congressman?


Dr. Sarhan - Absolutely, I don't believe I was going to be granted a meeting unless E.A. printed the letter requesting this meeting.

E.A. - How were you received at the Congressman's office?

Dr. Sarhan - I was greeted very nicely, they wanted me to sign in and establish that I was in the Congressman's district, and there were two security agents present that checked my brief case and then escorted me to the Congressman's office and then once the meeting was over they both escorted me out of the back door of the Congressman's office.

E.A. - Did you make any specific requests of Congressman Mario Diaz Balart?

Dr. Sarhan - Yes, I requested that several of the senior members of E.A. be allowed in the meeting with me as witnesses and to be there to help clarify the issues of elder abuse and elder financial abuse, however that request was denied by the Congressman.

E.A. - Did the Congressman offer you a reason for denying the attendance of the members of ELDERABUSEHELP.ORG?

Dr. Sarhan - The Congressman stated that he had 800,000 people in his district and that he could only meet with people that were part of his district.
I explained to the Congressman that they were not here to speak unless he wanted clarification on the issue of elder abuse and judicial fraud concerning elder guardianship, and that I wanted them to be a witness to this meeting, but he just said; "No."

E.A. - O.k., so now what steps had you taken before you went to Congressman Mario Diaz Balart for help?

Dr. Sarhan - I had gone to Katherine Fernandez Rundle at the State Attorneys office many times and asked for help, but it seems that Katherine Rundle knows about the elder abuse and exploitation and looks the other way while these crimes are being committed regarding the fraud and the racketeering involving the courts and court appointed guardians.

I and others believe that by her looking the other way and not stopping this elder abuse, that she knows the Judges, and the attorneys, and knows the guardians and just looks the other way while these people destroy lives and rob the elderly and their families of every dime that they have ever earned and all that they have saved.

We also believe she knows exactly what is happening in the probate courts and looks the other way, and so that is the problem. When dealing with Katherine Rundle, you will find that she will only forward documents to the Guardian Association who are complicit in stealing millions of dollars from elderly people.

I believe that the job of the State Attorney is to put criminals away, yet it seems that since there is no measure of accountability for their actions, the Judges, Attorneys and Guardians feel that they are above the law.

The Judicial System is supposed to work on the behalf of protecting our elders, but this is what happens when you have corruption in the system and it is very very difficult to get help when you have corrupt judges.

This is why Attorneys and Guardians are robbing these elders at an alarming rate because they know that there is no one to help us them or the victim's family. There is nobody watching while they are making millions of dollars by placing elders in improper guardianship's contrary to the spirit of Guardianship Laws which were put in place to protect elders and their families under certain circumstances.

E.A. - How did the Congressman react to your concerns regarding this issue of elder abuse by the courts and forced guardianship's and the alleged judicial corruption?

Dr. Sarhan - Well , I first handed him an article by the title; " Stolen Lives" by Ines Carr and then we went on to the medical reports showing that my mother was competent yet she was deemed by the court incompetent. They are ruling elderly people incompetent in order to steal their money, and I showed and read from each document, reports from doctors in which my mother clearly stated that she was happy with the care she was receiving from me, her son, Robert Sarhan and the Doctors were all very impressed by the care that my mother, Yvonne Sarhan received from me.

E.A. - In other words, your mother Yvonne Sarhan had already decided long ago whom she trusted to take care of her in the event that she became incapacitated?

Dr. Sarhan - Yes, absolutely! She had advance directives and a durable power of attorney. These are documents that are prepared specifically to avoid these types of situations where a stranger is appointed by a court and takes over an elders assets and then bills the elderly person down to their last few dollars.

E.A. - Did you leave Congressman Balart with any documents as part of your presentation?

Dr. Sarhan - Yes, I wanted to show the congressman that we had a clear case of elder abuse and exploitation so I left him with documents that clearly showed that the attorney that was representing my mother, was also representing the guardian at the same time. When we asked the lawyer representing my mother if he was also representing the guardian he denied it, therefore, he was misleading and committing fraud on the court.

So it was important to give him those documents to show him that indeed fraud and corruption is taking place and is a widespread problem not only in my mother's case but in many cases locally by the misuse of power in the probate courts.

E.A. - How did the Congressman react to your presentation of the facts?

Dr. Sarhan - Congressman Mario Diaz Balart asked me; "What do you want me do to?"

He told me that he did not have much power to do anything, and that he would write some letters to Katherine Rundle, the State Attorney and suggested that I write a bill to protect the elders and submit it to him for consideration.

E.A. - Once he went over the information with you, did you leave him any hard copy and or muti-media materials?

Dr. Sarhan - I left him with documents of my mothers mental examinations that show her competent and I left him documents that showed him fraud and corruption in regards to my mothers case. I also left him a copy of a video documentaries from various news an TV channels that were documenting cases of guardianship abuse and corruption committed upon the elderly people of our country.

E.A. - As the meeting with Congressman Balart was coming to a close, and after you told him everything that you knew about this problem, how did you feel when the Congressman said that there was nothing that he could do for you?

Dr. Sarhan - I was very disappointed! I felt that the Congressman took the time to review my material and evidence and that he realized that this is a very serious case of elderly exploitation, but he left me feeling as if he wasn't going to help. Don't get me wrong, I was grateful that he granted the meeting, but I felt he would just give a letter to the States Attorney and I would be back at square one again. The Congressman was simply saying that he could do nothing and did not have the power to introduce any special legislation!

He also told me to talk to my State Senator. Well, I had already sent a packet before to the Senator, but they never responded, then when I called my State Senator later, his assistant said he had it on his desk for months but didn't know what t0 do with it!
My zip code is 33170 and he sent me to two Senators that I wrote to but never heard back from either.

E.A. - How did the meeting end?

Dr. Sarhan - I pleaded over and over again to the Congressman, asking if he could write some kind of special legislature such as the "Palm Sunday Compromise" in the Terry Shiver case to get my mother out of this fraudulent guardianship case and back home where she belongs, but he said said he did not have the power to do that.

He said he could not help me, the only thing he could do was write a letter to the State Attorney.

E.A. - Well, thank you Dr. Sarhan.
Now may we contact you in the future for any follow up information regarding this issue?

Dr. Sarhan - Yes, absolutely!

E.A. - Great, that would be greatly appreciated by the members of E.A. and our readers as well!

Dr. Sarhan - Thank you E.A. for all of your help and support and without this organization, I believe I would have never gotten very far and thousands of your readers would never know that they were not alone in elderly abuse and the fraud we all refer to as a National Epidemic concerning the Elderly Citizens of this Great Nation.

--------------------------------

Editor's notes:

"We looked up Congressman Mario Diaz Balart's records on his web site and he has already sponsored H.Res. 995 (introduced 2/25/08) Commemorating the 12th anniversary of the 1996 shooting down of 2 unarmed Brothers to the Rescue civilian aircraft, licensed by the United States, by the Cuban regime.

He also has sponsored H.Con.Res. 260 (introduced 11/15/07) Condemning the kidnapping and hostage-taking of 3 United States citizens for over 4 years by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), and demanding their immediate and unconditional release.

Yet, he seems to be unable to intervene in the corrupt practice of declaring elder people incompetent in order to separate them from their families, their wealth, and thus destroying their lives, their families and anyone that stands in the way of this practice."
In Brake v. Murphy, 736 So.2d 745
(Fla. 3d DCA 1999), wherein the Third District, in reversing an order awarding attorney’s fees, states "probate court has become repugnant to a great many citizens."

--------------------------------------

Recent Comments :

A Congressman and the FBI said they could not do anything about this? I am assuming this means the letters that I am in the process of writing about the corruption here are going to yet again fall on deaf ears?What's the point of the National Association of Elder Law and Attorneys then?

In the United States?

Abuse and Neglect is okay as long as your not drowning your puppydog?I do not have the mindset to comprehend the statements you heard made by the Congressman and the FBI.

I would like to know this Congressman's name and the reasoning behind his comments?

Thank you..

Angela imangeiam@aol.com

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

THE TRUE STORY OF YVONNE SARHAN

The very people that are supposed to protect the Elderly are the very people that are robbing them, destroying there lives and in numerous cases, killing these elderly people, for the "Love Of Money."

My name is Dr. Robert Sarhan, this is a true story about Elderly Abuse and Exploitation of my mother, Yvonne Sarhan. The perpetrators of this heinous crime, the Miami-Dade County Probate Court Judge's, Attorney's and Guardian's. What I am about to say is not only about my case, but is almost identical to every case plagueing this country today, the only differences are, the names of the victims and perpetrators, have been changed.

How Could this Happen in America?

In most families one of the children is usually an under achiever or is unsuccessful and has low self esteem, such as my brother, Tony Sarhan. He was stealling from my father for many years, we owned a gas station here in Miami, Florida, where my brother worked for my father. My father died in a car accident on December 3, 1995, my brother moved in with my mother to save money on an apartment, since he was divorced and living alone. The neighbors and employees at our gas station called me and complained about my brothers behavior, spending my mother's money, never home, the house falling in a state of disrepair and more. I went to my mother's home and I asked my mother, what is going on here, she told me that my brother was taking all her money, I want you to stop him, come here and live with me. I said o.k..

I moved in, told my brother to leave, and asked I asked my mother, where is all your money, she said he took a lot, the rest is in annuities. My mother put her house in my name to protect and ensure she would live their for the rest of her life. However, soon you will see, how my promises to my mother would be broken and how our legal system is not a sytem at all. Many people may not believe what I am about to say, only the people that have been in guardianship cases in this country will believe, however, this is the truth, so help me GOD.

On January 8, 2003, my mother did a quit claim deed her home to me, to protect it and after she is gone I were to do as I please, since my mother was very dissappointed in her son Tony and did not trust him. I was living with my mother and she was all smiles, I am an excellent cook and I make a lot of jokes and my mom laughs at all of them. My mother has a great personality and never says a bad thing to anyone, she is a very good person that does not deserve what these Predators that Prey on the Elderly have done to her.

In June of 2003 my brother filed for my mother to have a guardian, immediately, my brothers attorney Cheryl Silverman froze my mother's assets and soon our horror story Begins. My brother stated, "if I am not going to be in charge of the money, no one will." Barbra Reiser was appointed as an Emergency Temporary Guardian (ETG) and Enrique Zamora was ordered to be my mother's court appointed attorney. I was told by the Guardian, Barbra Reiser that I had to have an attorney to be my mother's guardian, so I hired an attorney named, Harvey Rogers. Soon you will see, that was all a formailty, because I was never going to be my mother's guardian, because Barbra Reiser, Enrique Zamora, Cheryl Silverman and all others wanted my mother's money; and they would do anything illegal and unethical to get that money, and they have, and now they are stealing the home, that I was supposed to protect, I am sorry mom.

I will stop here and tell you what we found out, while this case was in the second year of litigation. Meritza Torrent, Michael Tristani, and myself all victims of Guardianship Fraud went down to the Miami-Dade County Courthouse, Probate Division records department and pulled 13 records that Barbra Reiser (ETG) was involved in. This is what we found:

1. Enrique Zamora was not on the Probate Wheel in violation of Rule 99-12. Which means Judge Bruce Levy violated this Rule 99-12 to bring Enrique Zamora into the case to ensure my mother, Yvonne Sarhan, did not have legal representation, so they could ensure my mother would be ruled incompetent, even though she was very competent as you will soon see.

2. Enrique Zamora was representing my mother, Yvonne Sarhan and at the same time, Enrique Zamora was representing Barbra Reiser (ETG) in another case, the case of Laurie Savage. So Enrique Zamora was representing my mother, Yvonne Sarhan at the same time he was representing, Barbra Reiser, an adverse party of my mother, since my mother wanted me, her son Dr. Robert Sarhan, as her Guardian, if she was ordered to have a guardian.

3. Enrique Zamora denied representing my mother Yvonne Sarhan and Barbra Reiser at the same time. Enrique Zamora lied , we had certified copies from the Court proving he was representing Barbra Reiser at the same time he was representing my mother.

4. Enrique Zamora would not write one motion in support of my mother's wishes, he sat there in the courtroom and watch my mother being attacked and ruled incompetent, when she was fully competent, and he knew this, soon you will see how the Florida bar would protect Zamora.

5. Cheryl Silverman, my brother's attorney, who is an adverse party, because my mother wanted these people out of her life, including my brother; was also representing Barbra Reiser at the same time she was representing my brother in the Estella Torrent Case.

6. Therefore Cheryl Silverman was representing Tony Sarhan and Barbra Reiser the Emergency Temporary Guardian at the same time, when the Emergency Temporary Guardian was supposed to be a neutral party, can you believe this, no, there is more.

7. Vicki Brail the permanent Guardian of my mother, was given the guardianship on December 2, 2003. Cheryl Silverman was also representing Vicki Brail in other on going cases.

8. Barbra Reiser uses Enrique Zamora as a personal reference on her application for guardianship of my mother. Vicki Brail uses Enrique Zamora and Cheryl Silverman as personal reference on her application for guardianship of my mother.

9. All this was a secret and once I found out about all this Collusion and Conspiracy to defraud the elderly, I thought I should win and get my mother out of this nightmare, but you will soon see how corrupt the legal system is and how the Florida Bar protects these Predators.

10. Remember, no one ever came forward and told us about these conflicts, we found out by doing research. Although, I was not supposed find out this information, the Judge's sweep it under the table, and soon you will see how they cover for each other and we fight for my mother's freedom, because kidnapping and Elderly Abuse and Exploitation is a crime and I want my mother back.

We jumped ahead and told you what we found but there is more, so let me take you back to June of 2003.

Become A Guardian Earn Up to $400 per Hour

Become a Guardian, Earn Big Bucks !

Registration for the training is $15. Anyone becoming a guardian or a conservator must take the class within 90 days of their court date, said Mary Ann Holland, the extension educator at the University of Nebraska Lincoln Extension. The training session educates people on the duties and responsibilities of being a guardian."Guardianship may be needed when an adult is no longer able to manage his or her affairs or becomes incapacitated due to an illness or injury," Holland said. "This may be a temporary appointment, or a guardian may be appointed to make decisions for only certain areas in the ward's life.

"There may be more than one guardian appointed, say one that makes decisions about the Ward's physical needs and a second guardian that has jurisdiction over only the financial area." Guardianship should only be used when necessary because guardians have a lot of legal power, according to the Guardianship Development Team.

Those considering guardianship of another should look at other options before deciding.

Sometimes, adult children may take guardianship of their elderly parents for protection."In some cases, adult children detect that an aging parent is being victimized by someone, or has become the target of a fraud or identity theft," Holland said. "The adult child seeks guardianship to protect their parent's assets." Registrations can be made by calling 267-2205. Deadline is April 4.

--------------------------------------

The beauty of being a guardian is there is no limit to the number of elderly people you can bill for guardianship duties, guardians have been known to make over $100,000 per client and payment is just about guaranteed by the court.

Another beautiful things about becoming a guardian is the old people are too sick and frail to complaint and even if they did , they have no one to complaint to! It's a recession proof business. Set Your own rates, the sky is the limit , your only limit is your own ability to contrive and connive.

Anyone who is elder and whose abilities are declining are good candidates to a forced guardianship, if they have no family or if they have discord withing the family your chances of success in this business greatly improve.

It is advantageous to have several lookouts for elders with money, Social workers who work hospitals can usually give you a good heads up on which elders are susceptible to this procedure and the best part it is that it's all 100% Legal !

As millions of baby boomers age the demand for Guardians is about to explode, Do not be left out of fantastic opportunity to make millions within a very short period time, buy real estate cheap! Jewelry, Bank Accounts, it's all there for the asking.

Do not let naive family members stand between money that could be yours . Become a guardian Now!

Ps. You might have to spread the wealth around, be prepared to give a 10% gratuity to keep the wheels greased.

Government Agencies Ignore Reports of Fraud by Lawyers and Judges

Washington, District of Columbia - By Sandy Meyer

Corporate, Judicial and Legislative fraud is costing millions of Americans their jobs, homes, earnings, health care, children's education and retirements.

America's government offices direct the defrauded millions to commissions, committees bureaus, and government and corporate funded non-profit agencies (NGOs) they claim are set up to help,homeowners and prosecute fraud.

Congress: Judiciary Committee, Banking Committee, Finance Committee - e.g. Reported widespread Judicial Fraud and Due Process Violations by lawyers and judges and requested they investigate and reverse the fraudulent judgments ---- Wendy Clardy Requests Foreclosure Fraud investigation by Judge David Fais, Citimortgage and Steven L. Sacks

Letter: Due Process Violation Investigation

But do any of these agencies prevent or prosecute home foreclosure fraud by corporations, lawyers and judges?

Who heads these commissions, committees and bureaus and non-profits we the taxpayers give billions of dollars to fund? Who are they really working for? Which corporations did they come from ? Where do they after misusing public offices to provide services to corporate and political interests?

What has happened to the millions of complaints which homeowners have sent to these public officials via voice mails, internet forms and the U. S. Mail?

Who is protecting American's against fraudulent liens, judgments and home foreclosures by lawyers and judges?

Read it All Here=>>